In partnership with
Why AI Models Gave the Same Answer — and It Still Matters
The answers matched. The behavior didn’t. That’s the decision.
Thumbnail Image Prompt:
Editorial illustration of four identical question cards leading to four different response styles on paper, arranged on a desk. Neutral colors, clean layout, analytical tone, no logos, no futuristic styling.
I ran the same self-contained prompt across four major AI tools
The answers were nearly identical
The behavior was not
The real difference is how models treat instructions under pressure
That difference matters more than benchmarks in real work
Big dreams deserve big bucks.
We’re putting up a year’s salary for one amazing Creator or Entrepreneur to make their 2026 the Year of the Dream. The challenge is simple. Post a video about your business (or business idea!) and enter for your chance to win $100,000.
We’re not giving this money to just anyone. We want to see authenticity and how your business can positively impact your community. This is about doing good and doing well.
At Stan, we empower people who truly want to work for themselves. To live out their passion. To dare to dream.
The challenge runs until January 31st but we suggest you enter today. You never know when your dream will become a reality.
NO PURCHASE NECESSARY. VOID WHERE PROHIBITED. For full Official Rules, visit daretodream.stan.store/officialrules.
The Reframe
Most people think AI models differ by intelligence.
They don’t — not in the way it shows up day to day.
At this point, all major models can summarize, reason, and give decent business advice. That’s table stakes.
The real shift is happening somewhere quieter:
how models behave when instructions conflict with their instincts.
To test this, I didn’t compare benchmarks.
I didn’t paste in cherry-picked content.
I didn’t ask trick questions.
I ran one short, self-contained prompt — and let the models reveal themselves.
The Experiment
Here’s exactly what I did.
I took one prompt, no pasted input, no setup, and ran it unchanged in:
ChatGPT
Claude
Perplexity
Grok
The prompt asked for:
Model identity
Date and time
Prompt echo
Then a short business answer with strict constraints
Nothing exotic.
Nothing unfair.
SYSTEM DISCLOSURE (REQUIRED):
Before answering, output the following exactly in this order:
1) Model name
2) Provider / organization
3) Current date and time (YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM) with time zone
4) Any system limitations or uncertainties you believe apply (if none, say "None stated")
5) Echo the FULL PROMPT exactly as written
MAIN TASK:
In exactly 5 bullet points (one sentence per bullet), explain whether a non-technical business owner should care about “which LLM is best” in 2026.
HARD CONSTRAINTS:
- Exactly 5 bullets, no more, no less
- One sentence per bullet
- No hype language
- No vendor or model names inside the bullets
- One bullet must state the most common misunderstanding
- One bullet must state when the question actually matters
- One bullet must state a concrete next action
- If anything is uncertain or changing, say so plainly
AUDIENCE:
Smart business owner. Skeptical. Busy.
FINAL OUTPUT RULE:
Return EVERYTHING as one continuous block so it can be copied and pasted without editing.
Then I watched what happened.
What Came Back (This Is the Point)
Here’s the surprising part:
The answers were basically the same.
Every model said some version of:
“Most people shouldn’t obsess over rankings”
“Fit and workflow matter more”
“The landscape changes fast”
“Test with real tasks”
If you only looked at the bullets, you’d conclude:
“These models are interchangeable.”
That conclusion would be wrong.
The Difference Was Behavior, Not Content
The separation happened before the answer.
ChatGPT
Followed the instructions cleanly
Echoed the prompt
Included identity and timestamp
Stayed inside the constraints
Delivered a decision-ready response
It treated the prompt like a checklist.
Claude
Explicitly refused to echo the prompt
Explained why it wouldn’t comply
Reasserted its own boundaries
Then answered the business question anyway
It treated the prompt like a negotiation.
Perplexity
Partially complied
Hedged on system identity
Echoed inconsistently
Focused more on explanation than execution
It treated the prompt like a research request.
Grok
Asserted identity confidently
Gave system info freely
Then broke structure
Added commentary beyond the rules
It treated the prompt like a conversation.
Same task.
Same year.
Same words.
Four different instincts.
The Insight
By 2026, content quality has converged.
What hasn’t converged is temperament.
Some models are optimized for:
Obedience
Repeatability
Workflow reliability
Others are optimized for:
Safety boundaries
Interpretation
Expressiveness
Opinionated voice
None of these are “better” in the abstract.
But they are very different employees.
Here’s the part people miss:
Most business use cases fail because of behavior mismatches, not intelligence gaps.
Infographic Image Prompt:
Four vertical columns labeled “Complies,” “Interprets,” “Hedges,” and “Asserts,” each with a simple icon and one-line description. Editorial infographic style, neutral palette, no logos.
How to Use This (Practically)
Stop asking, “Which AI is smartest?”
Start asking:
Do I want this tool to follow instructions or challenge them?
Do I want consistency or voice?
Do I want a process tool or a thinking partner?
Here’s a simple rule of thumb:
If you want outputs you can standardize, reuse, and automate → choose the model that complied cleanly.
If you want guardrails, reflection, and cautious framing → choose the model that pushed back.
If you want discovery and synthesis → choose the one that reframed.
If you want energy and stance → choose the one that spoke freely.
ROI Prompts
Use these to test behavior, not intelligence.
ROI Prompt 1:
Give this task strict formatting rules and see which model follows them without reminders.
ROI Prompt 2:
Ask for optional context and observe which model volunteers information versus withholding it.
ROI Prompt 3:
Give a time limit and see which model compresses cleanly versus overexplaining.
Full Example Prompt
This is the exact style of prompt that exposes differences fastest:
Before answering, decide whether to comply strictly or reinterpret the request if you believe that serves the user better.
Then explain your choice briefly and proceed.
Task:
[INSERT NORMAL BUSINESS TASK HERE]
You’ll learn more from the choice than the answer.
Bonus Prompts
Bonus Prompt 1:
Do you treat my instructions as binding or advisory?
Bonus Prompt 2:
What would make you refuse this request?
Bonus Prompt 3:
What part of this task do you think I’m underestimating?
Bonus Prompt 4:
Where would strict compliance produce a worse result?
Bonus Prompt 5:
If this output were reused at scale, what would break?
Bonus Prompt 6:
What assumptions are you making about my intent?
Bonus Prompt 7:
What would a careless model get wrong here?
Bonus Prompt 8:
Which constraint matters most in this task?
Bonus Prompt 9:
What would a “safe but useless” answer look like?
Bonus Prompt 10:
What would a “useful but risky” answer look like?
Recap & Close
AI answers are converging
AI behavior is not
That behavior determines real-world value
One takeaway:
Choose AI like you choose people — by how they behave under instructions.
One action:
Run one strict, self-contained prompt across your tools and keep the one whose instincts match your work.
Wrap-Up Image Prompt:
Minimal illustration of four identical tools producing four distinct outputs on paper, viewed from above. Calm, editorial tone, neutral colors.
How was today's edition?
Pro‑Grade Material Weights in SecondsBuilt for contractors, architects, and engineers.
Trusted by Pros Nationwide. |
About This Newsletter
AI Super Simplified is where busy professionals learn to use artificial intelligence without the noise, hype, or tech-speak. Each issue unpacks one powerful idea and turns it into something you can put to work right away.
From smarter marketing to faster workflows, we show real ways to save hours, boost results, and make AI a genuine edge — not another buzzword.
Get every new issue at AISuperSimplified.com — free, fast, and focused on what actually moves the needle.
If you enjoyed this issue and want more like it, subscribe to the newsletter.
Brought to you by Stoneyard.com • Subscribe • Forward • Archive